As Director of CRI’s Government Relations, I cover all 50 states. I see a lot (not sure that’s actually a good thing, but I’ll let you decide). I’ve been asked to share a little bit of my perspective on the issue. In order to do that I feel a little background is necessary.
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a strategy designed to promote the integration of environmental costs associated with goods throughout their life cycles into the market price of the products. Also known as "Product Stewardship," (EPR) uses political means to hold producers liable for the costs of managing their products at end of life.
There are a number of forms this can take: a reuse, buy-back, or recycling program, or in energy production. EPR transfers responsibility for waste from government to private industry. There are several ways that this can be approached: regulatory, negotiated and voluntary.
In Oregon, for example, earlier this year, legislation was introduced regarding EPR. It was all encompassing. The incredibly broad reach would have been very hard to manage and mandate. This particular piece of legislation even included carpet. In fact, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Website even provided a link to the CARE website.
Technorati Tags: Jennifer Mendez CRI Goverment Affairs CARE carpet environment EPR extended producer responsibility